ExplainersSurgical robotics

What is Smith+Nephew CORI?

Smith+Nephew CORI is a handheld imageless orthopedic surgical robotic system from Smith+Nephew (LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN). Per Agent A orthopedic ingest: FDA-cleared for total + partial + revision knee. CRITICAL HONESTY DISTINCTION: hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY, NOT robotic; common aggregator confusion blurs this; surfaced explicitly with cap-flag (knee is robotic; hip is navigation-only). Acquired Blue Belt Technologies 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020 evolution lineage. AI-augmented surgeon-controlled assistance (NOT autonomous; same assistive class as Mako + da Vinci + ROSA). Editorial throughline: handheld imageless commercial-niche archetype distinct from Stryker Mako's large-footprint CT-based architecture; knee-only robotic scope with navigation-only hip; smaller-footprint OR integration. Cohort positioning: handheld imageless orthopedic archetype within the surgical cluster's Wave 3 orthopedic sub-cohort triangle.

LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN

Smith+Nephew UK+US dual-listed parent

Handheld imageless

Architecture (smaller-footprint vs Mako large-footprint CT)

Total + partial + revision KNEE

FDA-cleared robotic procedure scope

Hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY

NOT robotic per Agent A honesty distinction

Blue Belt 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020

Multi-stage acquisition + product evolution lineage

Mid-2026

Snapshot date

Tier legend:VerifiedAbsence

Smith+Nephew CORI: handheld imageless orthopedic archetype

Smith+Nephew CORI is a handheld imageless orthopedic surgical robotic system from Smith+Nephew (LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN). Per DEPLOY's surgical cluster framework, CORI anchors the handheld imageless orthopedic archetype within the surgical cluster's Wave 3 orthopedic sub-cohort triangle alongside Stryker Mako (large-footprint CT-based) and Zimmer Biomet ROSA (mid-size cross-domain).

Smith+Nephew: LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN

Smith+Nephew is a publicly-traded medical-technology company dual-listed: LSE: SN (London) / NYSE: SNN (US). The UK + US dual-listing positions Smith+Nephew within both the UK + US medical-technology industrial-base layers; the company operates substantial orthopedic + wound-care + sports-medicine product portfolios beyond the CORI orthopedic-robotic vehicle.

Acquisition lineage: Blue Belt 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest, the CORI lineage operates through a multi-stage acquisition + product evolution:

  • Blue Belt Technologies acquired 2015: Smith+Nephew acquired Blue Belt Technologies, integrating handheld imageless orthopedic-robotic technology.
  • Navio (intermediate): Blue Belt's Navio handheld robotic system continued under Smith+Nephew ownership.
  • CORI 2020: rebranded/evolved as CORI Surgical System; current commercial generation.

Per DEPLOY's framework, the multi-stage lineage matters editorially at the entity verification layer: trade-press coverage framing CORI as a Smith+Nephew-native product without the Blue Belt + Navio lineage operates outside Agent A primary-source-anchored verification. The acquisition + evolution lineage is the load-bearing primary-source verification anchor.

FDA-cleared: total + partial + revision KNEE

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest, CORI is FDA-cleared for knee procedures:

  • Total knee: cleared.
  • Partial knee: cleared.
  • Revision knee: cleared.

Per DEPLOY's framework, the knee-only robotic clearance scope matters editorially in contrast to multi-procedure cohort entries: Mako cleared multi-procedure (knee + hip + spine + shoulder); ROSA cleared cross-domain (knee + hip + brain + shoulder). CORI's knee-only robotic scope is the load-bearing FDA-clearance-posture framing.

CRITICAL HONESTY DISTINCTION: hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY, NOT robotic

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest, the CORI hip indication requires precise scoping: hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY, NOT robotic. Common aggregator confusion blurs this distinction by listing CORI hip alongside CORI knee in robotic-procedure scope. Per cap-flag-as-trust-signal, the navigation-vs-robotic hip distinction is a critical honesty cap-flag:

  • CORI knee: ROBOTIC; full handheld robotic-assist execution.
  • CORI hip: NAVIGATION-ONLY; tracking + planning support without robotic execution; the surgeon performs the hip procedure manually with navigation guidance.

Per DEPLOY's framework, the navigation-vs-robotic distinction matters editorially at the FDA-clearance verification layer: trade-press coverage framing CORI as "robotic knee + hip" operates outside Agent A primary-source-anchored verification. The navigation-only hip framing is the load-bearing primary-source verification posture; the knee-only robotic framing preserves cohort-framework boundary against the multi-procedure-robotic claims of Mako + ROSA.

Handheld imageless architecture (distinct from Mako large-footprint CT)

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest, CORI operates a handheld imageless architecture structurally distinct from large-footprint CT-based alternatives:

  • CORI (handheld imageless): handheld robotic-assist device used intra-op; NO pre-operative CT imaging required; intra-op anatomy registration replaces pre-op CT planning.
  • Mako (large-footprint CT-based): pre-operative CT imaging informs patient-specific implant + cut plan; large-footprint robotic arm for intra-op execution.

Per DEPLOY's framework, the handheld imageless vs large-footprint CT-based architectural distinction is editorial signal at the cohort-architecture layer: imageless-handheld enables smaller-footprint OR integration + lower-imaging-prep workflow; CT-based enables patient-specific planning depth + larger-footprint robotic execution. The orthopedic sub-cohort form-factor variance is a load-bearing structural axis.

AI-augmented surgeon-controlled assistance (NOT autonomous); same class as Mako + da Vinci + ROSA

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest + DEPLOY's surgical cluster framework, CORI operates AI-augmented surgeon-controlled assistance, NOT autonomous-robotic surgery: same assistive class as Mako + Intuitive da Vinci + Moon Maestro + ROSA. The AI-augmented-not-autonomous framing is applied consistently across the orthopedic sub-cohort triangle and across the broader surgical cluster.

Per DEPLOY's framework, the consistent framing matters editorially: trade-press coverage framing orthopedic-robotic systems as "autonomous surgical robots" operates outside Agent A primary-source-anchored verification. The cohort-framework discipline preserves the assistive-vs-autonomous distinction across all surgical-robotic anchors.

Cohort positioning: handheld imageless orthopedic archetype

Per the surgical cluster framework, Smith+Nephew CORI anchors:

  • Handheld imageless orthopedic archetype: handheld intra-op device + imageless workflow; smaller-footprint OR integration; commercial-niche positioning.
  • Wave 3 orthopedic sub-cohort triangle: Mako (large-footprint CT-based) + CORI (handheld imageless) + ROSA (mid-size cross-domain); form-factor variance axis.
  • Knee-only robotic scope + navigation-only hip honesty distinction: critical FDA-clearance precision; consistent application of verified-vs-claimed framework.
  • Blue Belt 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020 lineage: multi-stage acquisition + product evolution within Smith+Nephew portfolio.
  • AI-augmented-surgeon-controlled-not-autonomous: consistent framing across orthopedic sub-cohort + broader surgical cluster.

Contrast with cohort:

Consumer pricing surface for Smith+Nephew CORI is forthcoming via Agent B's planned orthopedic sub-cohort /price triangle; per cap-flag-as-trust-signal, the consumer-price-page is documented as forthcoming honest-absence pending Agent B's ship. Registry institutional depth at Smith+Nephew registry company + CORI registry model.

For the canonical surgical cluster context, see the surgical robotics cluster. For the large-footprint CT-based contrast, see what is Stryker Mako. For the mid-size cross-domain contrast, see what is Zimmer Biomet ROSA. For the canonical category umbrella, see what is physical AI. For methodology canonical references applicable to Smith+Nephew CORI: the 4-way autonomy-boundary taxonomy (AI-augmented operator-controlled tier; handheld imageless variant) + verified-vs-claimed at within-entity granularity (CRITICAL HONESTY DISTINCTION: hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY NOT robotic; within-entity per-procedure scope) + the 9-tier source-quality rubric (FDA + Smith+Nephew SEC source classification).

EntityForm-factorProcedure scopeParent company

Smith+Nephew CORI

Handheld imageless robotic system

Knee-only ROBOTIC; hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY (NOT robotic)

Smith+Nephew (LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN)

Stryker Mako

Large-footprint CT-based robotic arm

Multi-procedure: knee + hip + spine (K241517) + shoulder (K242373)

Stryker (NYSE: SYK)

Zimmer Biomet ROSA

Mid-size multi-procedure platform

Knee + hip (direct-anterior) + brain (SEEG/DBS) + shoulder; cross-domain

Zimmer Biomet (NYSE: ZBH)

Intuitive da Vinci

Replacement-robotics monolithic console

Multi-procedure soft-tissue (vs orthopedic-bone)

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ: ISRG)

Moon Surgical Maestro

Assistive laparoscopy co-pilot

ASSISTIVE laparoscopy (NOT replacement)

Moon Surgical (French-US dual)

CMR Versius

Replacement-robotics modular soft-tissue

Soft-tissue surgical (EU + UK + Australia + India commercial)

CMR Surgical (UK; Cambridge)

Source: DEPLOY registry + Agent A orthopedic ingest + Smith+Nephew SEC filings + FDA 510(k) database verification. Surgical cohort orthopedic sub-cohort form-factor + procedure-scope + parent-company framework.

Frequently asked questions

What is Smith+Nephew CORI?

Smith+Nephew CORI is a handheld imageless orthopedic surgical robotic system from Smith+Nephew (LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN). Per Agent A orthopedic ingest: FDA-cleared for total + partial + revision knee; CRITICAL HONESTY DISTINCTION: hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY, NOT robotic; acquired Blue Belt Technologies 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020 evolution lineage. Per DEPLOY's surgical cluster framework, CORI anchors the handheld imageless orthopedic archetype within the Wave 3 orthopedic sub-cohort triangle alongside Stryker Mako (large-footprint CT-based) and Zimmer Biomet ROSA (mid-size cross-domain).

Does CORI do hip surgery?

CORI hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY, NOT robotic per Agent A orthopedic ingest CRITICAL HONESTY DISTINCTION. Common aggregator confusion blurs this distinction by listing CORI hip alongside CORI knee in robotic-procedure scope. CORI knee: ROBOTIC; full handheld robotic-assist execution. CORI hip: NAVIGATION-ONLY; tracking + planning support without robotic execution; the surgeon performs the hip procedure manually with navigation guidance. Per cap-flag-as-trust-signal, the navigation-only hip framing is the load-bearing primary-source verification posture.

What procedures is CORI cleared for?

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest, CORI is FDA-cleared for robotic knee procedures: total knee + partial knee + revision knee. The hip indication is NAVIGATION-ONLY (NOT robotic) per Agent A. Per DEPLOY's framework, the knee-only robotic clearance scope matters editorially in contrast to multi-procedure cohort entries: Mako cleared multi-procedure (knee + hip + spine + shoulder); ROSA cleared cross-domain (knee + hip + brain + shoulder). CORI's knee-only robotic scope is the load-bearing FDA-clearance-posture framing.

Is CORI autonomous surgery?

No, CORI operates AI-augmented surgeon-controlled assistance, NOT autonomous-robotic surgery per Agent A orthopedic ingest + DEPLOY's surgical cluster framework. Same assistive class as Stryker Mako + Intuitive da Vinci + Moon Surgical Maestro + Zimmer Biomet ROSA. The AI-augmented-not-autonomous framing is applied consistently across the orthopedic sub-cohort triangle and across the broader surgical cluster. Trade-press coverage framing orthopedic-robotic systems as "autonomous surgical robots" operates outside Agent A primary-source-anchored verification.

What's the difference between CORI and Mako?

Architecture + procedure scope + parent company. Smith+Nephew CORI: handheld imageless robotic system + knee-only robotic scope (hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY NOT robotic per Agent A); Smith+Nephew LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN; Blue Belt 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020 lineage. Stryker Mako: large-footprint CT-based robotic arm + multi-procedure scope (knee + hip + spine + shoulder); Stryker NYSE: SYK Portage MI; Mako acquired 2013 via $1.65B MAKO Surgical acquisition. Per DEPLOY's surgical cluster framework, CORI anchors the handheld imageless commercial-niche archetype; Mako anchors the large-footprint orthopedic market-leader archetype within the Wave 3 orthopedic sub-cohort triangle.

When did Smith+Nephew get CORI?

Per Agent A orthopedic ingest, the CORI lineage operates through a multi-stage acquisition + product evolution. Blue Belt Technologies acquired 2015: Smith+Nephew acquired Blue Belt Technologies, integrating handheld imageless orthopedic-robotic technology. Navio (intermediate): Blue Belt's Navio handheld robotic system continued under Smith+Nephew ownership. CORI 2020: rebranded/evolved as CORI Surgical System; current commercial generation. Per DEPLOY's framework, trade-press coverage framing CORI as a Smith+Nephew-native product without the Blue Belt + Navio lineage operates outside Agent A primary-source-anchored verification.

Smith+Nephew CORI verified as handheld imageless orthopedic archetype. Smith+Nephew LSE: SN / NYSE: SNN dual-listed. CORI lineage: Blue Belt Technologies acquired 2015 → Navio → CORI 2020. FDA-cleared for total + partial + revision KNEE. CRITICAL HONESTY DISTINCTION: hip is NAVIGATION-ONLY, NOT robotic per Agent A orthopedic ingest; common aggregator confusion blurs this; surfaced explicitly with cap-flag (knee is robotic; hip is navigation-only). Handheld imageless architecture structurally distinct from Stryker Mako large-footprint CT-based architecture; smaller-footprint OR integration. AI-augmented surgeon-controlled assistance (NOT autonomous); same assistive class as Mako + da Vinci + Maestro + ROSA, consistently framed across the orthopedic sub-cohort triangle and broader surgical cluster. How DEPLOY verifies →

Continue reading

Compare alternatives

Smith+Nephew registry companySmith+Nephew CORI registry modelStryker Mako comparison explainerSurgical robotics cluster

More in surgical robotics

View all 18 explainers in surgical robotics

← All explainers